2010 City of Crandall Bond Election
Frequently Asked Questions
GENERAL QUESTIONS
WHAT ARE MUNICIPAL BONDS?
• Bonds are a City’s way of borrowing money, just as a homeowner might
borrow money to remodel a kitchen or add a bathroom.
• Cities sell bonds to raise money for capital improvement projects
like libraries, fire stations, recreation centers, bridges, erosion
projects, street projects, and drainage projects, etc.
• Typically, bonds are not used for equipment or personnel, such as
buying fire trucks or hiring extra police officers.
• Bond items usually have a life of more than 10 years.
• Bonds must be used for the purpose specified.
WHY DID THE CITY OF CRANDALL DECIDE TO HOLD A BOND ELECTION?
• The City of Crandall has two critical needs to address and does not
have the funds to pay for them. The City could also issue certificates
of obligation to fund these improvements and the process would be much
faster, but holding a bond election and issuing bonds provides the citizens
with the power to choose whether or not they want the City to borrow
money for these purposes.
• The citizens do have some say with regard to certificates of obligation,
but they have to submit a petition and go through a process. With a
bond election, they can voice their opinion more easily by just voting.
IS THE TIMING REALLY RIGHT FOR A BOND ELECTION? WHY NOW?
• Presently, the construction business is slow, which means bids should
be very competitive.
• Interest rates are historically low, allowing Crandall to borrow money
at the lowest cost.
• Projects are expected to generate construction-related jobs in Crandall
during high unemployment.
• Road reconstruction will reduce the maintenance costs of today’s roads.
• When the economy rebounds, having the roadway improvements and the
new police station in place may create a safer environment and encourage
new development, especially downtown. Waiting until the economy improves
to fund these projects could greatly delay these opportunities.
WHY WEREN’T PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS, HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS, DOWNTOWN
IMPROVEMENTS, SPORTS FACILITIES, WATER AND SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES
OFFERED AS BOND PROPOSALS?
• Public Input through surveys conducted earlier this year identified
roadway improvements as the most pressing needs in Crandall.
• The City wants to keep any tax increase to a minimum, so residents
pay the least amount needed to address the problems residents identified
as important in surveys conducted earlier this year.
• Many of the projects listed above are in the planning stage and are
not ready to be included in a bond proposal.
WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF BONDS?
• REVENUE BONDS These bonds are used for funding permanent capital improvements
for an enterprise fund such as water and wastewater. Repayment of these
bonds is from the revenues of the enterprise fund.
• CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION (CO) This is a written promise secured by
the full faith and credit of the City. Used for funding permanent capital
improvements. Debt Service is paid from property taxes or system revenues.
• GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (GO) These bonds are used for funding permanent
public capital improvements such as buildings, streets, and bridges.
The repayment of these bonds is made from the levy of property tax.
Voter approval is required to issue these bonds.
WHAT KIND OF BONDS IS CRANDALL PROPOSING?
• GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (GO) A new police station and road reconstruction
are permanent public capital improvements. These items are important
to residents of Crandall, as determined in a recent survey. Because
the repayment of these bonds is from the levy of property tax, the city
wants to let the citizens vote and determine the outcomes. Voter approval
is required to issue GO bonds, and that’s why the city chose that route.
FINANCING QUESTIONS
WHAT TAX INCREASE WOULD BE NEEDED TO FINANCE THE BONDS?
• Crandall’s current proposed tax rate is 74-1/2 cents per $100 in property
evaluation.
• Proposition 1 – for a new Police Station would increase taxes $9.17
a month for the average-priced home of $124,219.
• Proposition 2 – for Roadway Improvements would increase taxes $11.45
a month for the average-priced home of $124,219.
• Together, the two propositions would increase Crandall’s currently
proposed rate of $0.7457 to 94-1/2 cents per $100 evaluation. An average-priced
home of $124,219 would have a tax increase of $.68 a day.
WHAT IS THE TERM OF THE BONDS? WHEN WILL THE BOND TAX INCREASE END?
• The term of the bonds will be about 20 years, but the bond propositions
being submitted to the voters authorize a term of up to 40 years. The
actual term of the bonds will depend somewhat on the population growth
of Crandall. This does not mean that after that time, your taxes will
automatically decrease. Whether the tax amount is continued or ended
will be determined by the City Council based on financial and economic
factors at that time.
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECTS?
• Yes, the City of Crandall has requested and received a $750,000 grant
from the North Central Texas Council of Governments for the improvements
to First Street, reducing the cost of that project to taxpayers by 77%.
DOES THE BOND PROGRAM INCLUDE MONEY FOR EQUIPMENT OR EMPLOYEE SALARIES?
• No, the bond proposals do not cover equipment or personnel.
PROPOSAL 1: $1.5 million
New Police Station
WHY DO WE NEED A NEW POLICE STATION?
WHY ISN’T THE CURRENT STATION ADEQUATE?
• The current facility inefficiently crowds 13 officers into 900 square
feet.
• There is no storage space, no temporary detention provision, no evidence/property
processing area.
• The current building and areas within the building have an insufficient
level of security.
• The current facility has signs of roof leakage, which can mean problems
including mold, damage to records, and the compromising of evidence.
• A new building will allow the City to comply with the federal Energy
Code, handicapped accessibility, building codes, evidence integrity
needs, building security and emergency power generation.
• The new facility will have a training room that will be used for in-service
training and can be used for community-oriented crime prevention programs
such as the Citizens Police Academy, Teen/Youth Academy, Neighborhood
Watch, etc.
• The current police station is a total of 900 sq ft. for 13 officers.
DOES THE POLICE STATION PROPOSAL INCLUDE THE COST OF THE LAND?
• No, the City of Crandall already owns the land on which the new police
station would be built.
WILL THE NEW POLICE STATION BE ADEQUATE FOR CRANDALL GROWTH, THROUGH
HEARTLAND OR OTHERWISE?
• The new facility is designed to accommodate up to 30 officers and
has room for expansion when needed.
WHY NOT WAIT UNTIL HEARTLAND ANNEXATION TAKES PLACE SO THAT CRANDALL
CAN DETERMINE IF MUNICPAL OFFICES SHOULD MOVE NORTH OF HIGHWAY 175 TO
BE IN THE NEW CENTER OF CRANDALL’S POPULATION?
• If annexed, Heartland already has a provision for a police substation
located there.
• Annexation may not take place until 2015 or after.
• A downtown location for the Police Department is part of the City’s
Plan to make downtown the “central heart” of the City,
• A new downtown Police Headquarters would increase police visibility
and perception of safety in the downtown area.
WHY NOT INCLUDE THE COST OF A HOLDING/DETENTION FACILITY IN THE POLICE
STATION NOW INSTEAD OF IN THE FUTURE?
• The current detention process should be effective for the near future,
so the $1 million cost of a temporary holding facility cannot be justified
at this time.
HOW WILL THE NEW POLICE STATION AFFECT CRIME AND GENERAL SAFETY IN
CRANDALL?
• The facility will provide new resources for officers to process evidence
and to conduct interviews and investigations.
• The building will provide visible police presence, which increase
police visibility and perception of safety in the downtown area.
• The building will provide facilities for community anti-crime programs.
WHAT WOULD THE EFFECT OF NOT HAVING A NEW POLICE FACILITY BE ON CRANDALL?
• It will be difficult for the Police Department to expand services.
• It will be difficult to meet the increased needs of a growing city.
• With improper storage, security, and temporary detention, the City
could be exposed to risk and open to lawsuits.
WHEN WOULD THE POLICE STATION GROUNDBREAKING TAKE PLACE AND WHEN WOULD
THE FACILITY BE OPERATIONAL?
• The groundbreaking would take place in 2011 and the station would
become operational in 2012.
PROPOSITION 2: $2 million
Roadway Improvements
HOW WERE THE STREET REPAIR PROJECTS IN THE PROPOSED BOND PROGRAM SELECTED?
• The City contracted with Fugro Consultants to assess existing roadways.
Based on pavement condition, they classified roads as Good, Fair, Marginal,
Poor and Very Poor.
• All roads within the downtown network area rated Poor and Very Poor
were included (approx. 6.6 miles total.)
• Repair of a collapsed inlet and drainage pipe in the Buffalo Creek
Subdivision was considered essential by city staff and council.
HOW LONG WILL THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS LAST?
• Sidewalks on First Street are expected to have an effective life of
about 20-50 years.
• The Buffalo Creek inlet and road repairs are expected to have an effective
life of about 30 years.
• The asphalt roadway improvements, with regular maintenance, are expected
to have an effective life of about 7 to 10 years, with consistent maintenance
and sealing of cracks.
WILL THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS HELP ALLEVIATE MORNING CONGESTION CAUSED
BY WORK AND SCHOOL TRAFFIC?
• Yes, this will improve the flow of traffic by opening up roads that
are virtually non-drivable now, spreading traffic over more roadways.
IF THE ROADWAY PROPOSAL PASSES, WHEN WILL ACTUAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION
BEGIN AND END?
• The plan is to disburse the bond funds in Spring 2011, begin construction
in Summer 2011, and complete improvements by Spring 2012.
WHAT IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MADE TO ROADS IN BUFFALO CREEK?
• Due to the extensive cost of concrete roadway repairs, only Buffalo
Creek road sections rated “Very Poor“ will be repaired with bond funds.
The “Very Poor“ areas of Buffalo Creek totaled about 0.3 tenths of a
mile while “Poor” sections totaled 1.1 miles. One mile of asphalt roadway
reconstruction costs approximately $180,000, compared to $800,000 for
one mile of concrete roadway reconstruction. Repairing that 1.1 miles
of roadway, would require an additional $900,000 to Proposition 2.